BBC: Indian PM Manmohan Singh has said India will not accept any new conditions in the bilateral US-India nuclear technology agreement which will share US civilian nuclear technology with India. Prime minister Singh statement was released when the US House of Representatives began debating whether to ratify the agreement. Critics of the accord say it will damage non-proliferation efforts, help generate an nuclear arms race in the region, and free up some India's existing reactors solely to produce warheads for the military. Proponents for the agreement say it will help India put some of its reactors under international safeguards, and help the US nuclear industry. The deal also has implications for India's science community. Pakistan has ramped up efforts for producing its own plutonium stockpile since the deal was announced. The US Congress is expected to ratify the US-India agreement before the end of July.
India pressures US Congress over nuclear deal
Categories:
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://blogs.physicstoday.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/609
Search
Categories
- Acoustics
- Agencies (24)
- Arms Control (90)
- Biophysics (26)
- Education (141)
- Energy (260)
- Environment (410)
- Everyday Physics (238)
- Laboratories (120)
- Medical Physics (10)
- Nanotechnology (59)
- Obituaries (21)
- Opinion (60)
- Planetary and Geophysics (262)
- Policy & Government (462)
- Quantum physics (28)
- Research (265)
- Science and Society (332)
- Space & Astronomy (516)
- Technology (387)
Monthly Archives
- August 2009 (14)
- July 2009 (86)
- June 2009 (91)
- May 2009 (81)
- April 2009 (98)
- March 2009 (97)
- February 2009 (80)
- January 2009 (64)
- December 2008 (68)
- November 2008 (65)
- October 2008 (93)
- September 2008 (98)
- August 2008 (110)
- July 2008 (97)
- June 2008 (117)
- May 2008 (122)
- April 2008 (103)
- March 2008 (106)
- February 2008 (87)
- January 2008 (94)
- December 2007 (82)
- November 2007 (96)
- October 2007 (98)
- September 2007 (93)
- August 2007 (98)
- July 2007 (91)
- June 2007 (83)
- May 2007 (89)
- April 2007 (87)
- March 2007 (88)
- February 2007 (81)
- January 2007 (89)
- December 2006 (80)
- November 2006 (80)
- October 2006 (89)
- September 2006 (80)
- August 2006 (92)
- July 2006 (76)
- June 2006 (91)
- May 2006 (83)
- April 2006 (60)
Leave a comment