Myhrvold's insight into innoviation
The New Yorker:In 1999, when physicist and millionaire Nathan Myhrvold left Microsoft and struck out on his own, he set himself an unusual goal. He wanted to see whether the kind of insight that leads to invention could be engineered. He formed a company called Intellectual Ventures. He raised hundreds of millions of dollars. He hired the smartest people he knew. It was not a venture-capital firm. Venture capitalists fund insights—that is, they let the magical process that generates new ideas take its course, and then they jump in. Myhrvold wanted to make insights—to come up with ideas, patent them, and then license them to interested companies.
The original expectation was that I.V. would file a hundred patents a year. Currently, it’s filing five hundred a year. It has a backlog of three thousand ideas. Physicist Lowell Wood said that he once attended a two-day invention session presided over by biologist Edward Jung, and after the first day the group went out to dinner. “So Edward took his people out, plus me,” Wood said. “And the eight of us sat down at a table and the attorney said, ‘Do you mind if I record the evening?’ And we all said no, of course not. We sat there. It was a long dinner. I thought we were lightly chewing the rag. But the next day the attorney comes up with eight single-spaced pages flagging thirty-six different inventions from dinner.”
The original expectation was that I.V. would file a hundred patents a year. Currently, it’s filing five hundred a year. It has a backlog of three thousand ideas. Physicist Lowell Wood said that he once attended a two-day invention session presided over by biologist Edward Jung, and after the first day the group went out to dinner. “So Edward took his people out, plus me,” Wood said. “And the eight of us sat down at a table and the attorney said, ‘Do you mind if I record the evening?’ And we all said no, of course not. We sat there. It was a long dinner. I thought we were lightly chewing the rag. But the next day the attorney comes up with eight single-spaced pages flagging thirty-six different inventions from dinner.”
Comments
This was a great article, wasn't it? It's refreshing to see a non-tech publication like the New Yorker write such an informative account.
As an IP Analyst and patent agent, I fully appreciate the true massive-ness of these invention backlogs. It's a great thing, but I wonder what the rate-limiting factor for patent filing will be. Fiscal resources, the USPTO, availability of patent practitioners? It certainly isn't ideas.
Posted by: Nicole | May 6, 2008 3:34 PM