Home   |   Print edition   |   Advertising   |   Buyers Guide   |   Jobs   |   Events calendar   |   RSS feeds

« Chasing Tornadoes with VORTEX2 | News Picks home | Opinion: What is the impact of space debris on the Earth's atmosphere? »

Q & A with Steven Chu

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks

Technology Review: Kevin Bullis interviews Department of Energy secretary Steven Chu. The questions include what to do with nuclear waste:

Steven Chu: Yucca Mountain as a repository is off the table. What we're going to be doing is saying, let's step back. We realize that we know a lot more today than we did 25 or 30 years ago. The NRC [Nuclear Regulatory Commission] is saying that the dry cask storage at current sites would be safe for many decades, so that gives us time to figure out what we should do for a long-term strategy. We will be assembling a blue-ribbon panel to look at the issue.

[We're] looking at reactors that have a high-energy neutron spectrum that can actually allow you to burn down the long-lived actinide waste. [Editor's note: Actinides include plutonium, which can be dangerous for 100,000 years.] These are fast neutron reactors. There's others: a resurgence of hybrid solutions of fusion fission where the fusion would impart not only energy, but again creates high-energy neutrons that can burn down the long-lived actinides.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blogs.physicstoday.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3538

2 Comments

The National Academy of Sciences has raised questions about the safety of spent fuel storage pools at nuclear reactor sites. Susanne E. Vandenbosch

Actinides, depending on the process used, include Neptunium237 with a half-life of 2 million years.

Leave a comment