Does quantum entanglement violate relativity?

Ars Technica: Quantum entanglement has been shown to exist and, so far, has not been affected by the distance between the entangled particles. How entanglement works without violating relativity’s limit on the speed of information transfer is still not understood. One explanation is the idea of nonlocality, which suggests that entangled particles are still considered part of the same quantum system regardless of the distance between them. But the concept of nonlocality is uncomfortable to some theorists. An alternative theory suggests that there are hidden, nonmeasurable, variables in quantum systems, but a new analysis has shown that hidden variables would still allow faster-than-light communication. In a paper in Nature Physics, researchers describe how they examined a theoretical entangled system in which hidden variables were allowed to communicate faster than light. They determined that because of the symmetry inherent in quantum systems, the measurable variables would also transfer information faster than light. But faster-than-light communication violates the theory of relativity. Although that fact doesn’t necessarily disprove hidden-variable explanations for quantum entanglement, it might mean that relativity would need to be adjusted.

One thought on “Does quantum entanglement violate relativity?

  1. One possible way around this dilimmae is to assume that determinism is absolute in nature. The measurements are correlated for entangled systems because each seperated system runs on an internal hidden clock that determines how it will reveal itself when perturbed by a measuring apparatus. Each clock is set at the time the entanglement occurs and each clock is completely governed by pure deterministic ontology.

    For the above system to work, the entirely of the universe both at the quantum level and at the classical level would be completely determininistic including human acts of free will. The out come of a particle measurement may appear random, but may infact be no more so that the outcome of a roullette wheel turn which can not be easily predicted in advance by game players.

    Catholic clergymen and theologians should have no objection to the above proposal since they already assert that GOD knows the future in complete detail in what will occur and what is possible to occur. If the future is not thus set, GOD could not know what will occur.

    Thus, perhaps a new interpretation of human free will is required.