Salon.com: On energy, I would say that the reliance on the government to devise a policy is a fallacy. I would advocate that the free market take care of that. The government shouldn't be directing research and development because they are bound and determined to always misdirect money to political cronies. The government ends up subsidizing things like the corn industry to develop ethanol and it turns out that it's not economically feasible. So, my answer to energy is to let the market work. Let supply and demand make the decision. Let prices make the decision. That is completely different than the bureaucratic and cronyism approach.
Ron Paul on energy policy
Categories:
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://blogs.physicstoday.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2197
Search
Categories
- Climate change (87)
- Energy policy (72)
- Nuclear weapons (54)
- Science education (52)
- Science investment (87)
- Teaching evolution (17)
- Agencies (15)
- Employment and careers (7)
- Facilities (13)
- International science (14)
- Policy & Government (101)
- Political Conventions (7)
- Science and Society (68)
- Science and the media (39)
- Scientific societies (7)
Monthly Archives
- June 2011 (3)
- May 2011 (10)
- April 2011 (7)
- March 2011 (6)
- February 2011 (8)
- January 2011 (6)
- December 2010 (7)
- November 2010 (9)
- October 2010 (11)
- September 2010 (7)
- August 2010 (3)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (5)
- May 2010 (9)
- April 2010 (14)
- March 2010 (16)
- February 2010 (7)
- January 2010 (6)
- December 2009 (11)
- November 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (8)
- September 2009 (7)
- August 2009 (6)
- July 2009 (12)
- June 2009 (16)
- May 2009 (9)
- April 2009 (12)
- March 2009 (6)
- February 2009 (5)
- January 2009 (9)
- December 2008 (6)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (6)
- September 2008 (10)
- August 2008 (9)
- July 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (1)
- February 2008 (1)
- January 2008 (75)
- December 2007 (3)
- November 2007 (1)
- October 2007 (8)