Ron Paul has stated that he is against military activity in almost every circumstance when war isn’t declared. He states that because the US went back and offered deals to the North Koreans after they exploded a nuclear weapon, while invading Iraq, a country that did not have an atomic bomb, the US is offering an “tremendous incentive” to non-nuclear states to develop nuclear weapons. He has no other statement on the future status of the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile.
Ron Paul on nuclear weapons
Categories:
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://blogs.physicstoday.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2230
Search
Categories
- Climate change (87)
- Energy policy (72)
- Nuclear weapons (54)
- Science education (52)
- Science investment (87)
- Teaching evolution (17)
- Agencies (15)
- Employment and careers (7)
- Facilities (13)
- International science (14)
- Policy & Government (101)
- Political Conventions (7)
- Science and Society (68)
- Science and the media (39)
- Scientific societies (7)
Monthly Archives
- June 2011 (3)
- May 2011 (10)
- April 2011 (7)
- March 2011 (6)
- February 2011 (8)
- January 2011 (6)
- December 2010 (7)
- November 2010 (9)
- October 2010 (11)
- September 2010 (7)
- August 2010 (3)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (5)
- May 2010 (9)
- April 2010 (14)
- March 2010 (16)
- February 2010 (7)
- January 2010 (6)
- December 2009 (11)
- November 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (8)
- September 2009 (7)
- August 2009 (6)
- July 2009 (12)
- June 2009 (16)
- May 2009 (9)
- April 2009 (12)
- March 2009 (6)
- February 2009 (5)
- January 2009 (9)
- December 2008 (6)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (6)
- September 2008 (10)
- August 2008 (9)
- July 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (1)
- February 2008 (1)
- January 2008 (75)
- December 2007 (3)
- November 2007 (1)
- October 2007 (8)