On the last day that the University of Virginia could appeal a civil investigative demand (similar to a subpoena) by Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli to investigate former UVa scientist Michael Mann, the university went to court to defend its academic freedom on nine grounds.
At first, it looked like UVa's governing board was planning to comply with the CID, but the uproar among UVa faculty and elsewhere led UVa president John T. Casteen III to hire the law firm Hogan Lovells to see what options the university had.
UVa argued in a motion filed in Charlottesville that Cuccinelli's subpoena for papers and e-mail from Mann exceeds the attorney general's authority under state law. In particular, the CID did not specify "the nature of the conduct constituting the alleged violation," or why Mann was singled out for investigation.
The issue is one of the roadblocks that could hold up Senate ratification of the treaty.