In the final run of its fruitful decade-long operation, the PEPII electron–positron collider at SLAC has revealed the lowest-energy state of bottomonium, the heaviest family of mesons. All the bottomonium mesons are bound quark–antiquark pairs of the bottom quark b. And they all have masses near 10 GeV, roughly the mass of a boron atom. Until now, the only known bottomonium mesons have had the spins of the two spin-½ quarks aligned to form triplet spin-1 configurations. Their lower-energy singlet spin-0 hyperfine partners had to exist, but 30 years of looking for them had been in vain. So there was almost no empirical information about the spin dependence of the strong force between b quarks. Quantum chromodynamics, the relevant theory, should in principle predict the hyperfine mass splitting. But QCD predictions are notoriously hard to calculate. Computational tricks based on QCD are presumed to do best with the heaviest quarks. Because top quarks are too short-lived to form mesons or any other particles, b-quark states afford the best opportunity for comparing theory with measurement. Having now discovered the spin-singlet ground state, labeled ηb, the BaBar detector collaboration at PEPII has measured its mass to lie just 71±4 MeV below that of Y(1S), the lowest-mass spin-triplet state, whose discovery in 1977 first revealed the existence of the b quark. BaBar’s measurement of the hyperfine mass splitting provides an important validation of the lattice-QCD computational technique that predicted 61±14 MeV. (A. Aubert et al., http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.1086.) — Bertram M. Schwarzschild
Bottomonium ground state
Categories:
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://blogs.physicstoday.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2528
2 Comments
Search
Categories
- Acoustics (12)
- Astronomy and cosmology (40)
- Atomic physics (23)
- Biography and personalities
- Biological physics (43)
- Careers and employment
- Chemical physics and molecular physics (37)
- Classical mechanics and electromagnetism (5)
- Computational physics (15)
- Condensed matter (47)
- Crystallography (8)
- Earth sciences (37)
- Education (1)
- Energy policy and R&D (6)
- Engineering and technology (34)
- Facilities and laboratories (1)
- Fluids & rheology (29)
- Government agencies (2)
- History, sociology, and philosophy (1)
- Instrumentation (12)
- Materials science (31)
- Medical physics (4)
- Metrology and fundamental constants (4)
- Microscopy (13)
- Nanoscale science and technology (25)
- Nonlinear science and emergent phenomena (17)
- Nuclear and particle physics (17)
- Optics and photonics (36)
- Plasma physics (7)
- Quantum physics and information (23)
- Science policy and politics (4)
- Scientific societies and awards
- Statistical physics and thermodynamics (14)
- Theoretical physics (16)
Monthly Archives
- June 2011 (5)
- May 2011 (8)
- April 2011 (8)
- March 2011 (9)
- February 2011 (7)
- January 2011 (8)
- December 2010 (9)
- November 2010 (8)
- October 2010 (9)
- September 2010 (8)
- August 2010 (9)
- July 2010 (8)
- June 2010 (8)
- May 2010 (8)
- April 2010 (9)
- March 2010 (9)
- February 2010 (7)
- January 2010 (7)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (8)
- October 2009 (10)
- September 2009 (8)
- August 2009 (9)
- July 2009 (9)
- June 2009 (9)
- May 2009 (7)
- April 2009 (9)
- March 2009 (9)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (7)
- December 2008 (8)
- November 2008 (7)
- October 2008 (9)
- September 2008 (9)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (11)
- June 2008 (2)
This is an interesting development. The ever growing number of known composite particles points to the richness of the strong nuclear force and the complexity of QCD.
I have often wondered if, given all of the decay sequences known to mankind for the entire set of known fundamental particles and known composite particles, whether or not there is anyway that such sub-sequences can be combined or any of the various short lived particles, composite and/or simple, be colocated in spacetime in such a manner that useful exothermic reactions can be facilitated, perhaps for energy production, novel spatial-temporal effects, or yet to be discovered particles produced without the need for extremely high particle energies such as the 14 TeV of the LHC at CERN.
There are now so many known decay sequences and there are becoming so many known composite particles that the mind becomes boggled by the complexity of the thermodynamic degrees of freedom that exist in particle physics interactions.
In a way, I am pleased by all of this richness and complexity and feel like a kid in a candy shop every time a new particle or element/isotope is discovered. I get the feeling that there will always be new ground for particle physics to cover.
In the Physics Today article it says "the only bottomonium mesons an electron-positron collider can make directly are the Y(nS) states" These states have spin 1. I don't understand why the spin-0 ground state can't be made directly?