In the 1970s, the hypothesis arose that our solar system was formed by a passing shock wave from a supernova, which triggered the collapse of an interstellar cloud into a dense region of gas and dust that further contracted to become the Sun and its orbiting planets. The original evidence came from very old meteorites that contained magnesium-26, a daughter product of the short-lived radioactive isotope (SLRI) aluminum-26—produced in stellar nucleosynthesis. Further evidence came from another SLRI, nickel-60, which can only be produced in a supernova's furnace. In astronomical terms, short-lived means a half-life of about a million years; any SLRIs would have been transported to, and dropped off in, the pre-solar cloud faster than that time scale. Computer modelers from the late 1990s, however, could not produce both the collapse and the injection of supernova material unless they artificially prevented the shock wave from heating the cloud. That situation has now been remedied by a group from the Carnegie Institution of Washington, who used a modern, adaptive-grid computer code with an improved treatment of heating and cooling. Their new models show that a supernova's shock wave moving into an otherwise stable solar-mass cloud can both trigger the collapse and leave behind enriched gas and dust, including the SLRIs whose products are found in meteorites. Furthermore, the researchers found that a protostar began to form in less than 200 000 years, in the blink of an astronomical eye. (A. P. Boss et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 686, L119, 2008.) —Stephen G. Benka
Shocking start for the solar system
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://blogs.physicstoday.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2811
1 Comment
Search
Categories
- Acoustics (12)
- Astronomy and cosmology (40)
- Atomic physics (23)
- Biography and personalities
- Biological physics (43)
- Careers and employment
- Chemical physics and molecular physics (37)
- Classical mechanics and electromagnetism (5)
- Computational physics (15)
- Condensed matter (47)
- Crystallography (8)
- Earth sciences (37)
- Education (1)
- Energy policy and R&D (6)
- Engineering and technology (34)
- Facilities and laboratories (1)
- Fluids & rheology (29)
- Government agencies (2)
- History, sociology, and philosophy (1)
- Instrumentation (12)
- Materials science (31)
- Medical physics (4)
- Metrology and fundamental constants (4)
- Microscopy (13)
- Nanoscale science and technology (25)
- Nonlinear science and emergent phenomena (17)
- Nuclear and particle physics (17)
- Optics and photonics (36)
- Plasma physics (7)
- Quantum physics and information (23)
- Science policy and politics (4)
- Scientific societies and awards
- Statistical physics and thermodynamics (14)
- Theoretical physics (16)
Monthly Archives
- June 2011 (5)
- May 2011 (8)
- April 2011 (8)
- March 2011 (9)
- February 2011 (7)
- January 2011 (8)
- December 2010 (9)
- November 2010 (8)
- October 2010 (9)
- September 2010 (8)
- August 2010 (9)
- July 2010 (8)
- June 2010 (8)
- May 2010 (8)
- April 2010 (9)
- March 2010 (9)
- February 2010 (7)
- January 2010 (7)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (8)
- October 2009 (10)
- September 2009 (8)
- August 2009 (9)
- July 2009 (9)
- June 2009 (9)
- May 2009 (7)
- April 2009 (9)
- March 2009 (9)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (7)
- December 2008 (8)
- November 2008 (7)
- October 2008 (9)
- September 2008 (9)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (11)
- June 2008 (2)
It would be interesting to know what the original density of the cloud has to be in order to produce this result and, if the researchers looked at reducing the density until such time as the collapse doesn't materialize. This will give a lower limit to the solar system mass and, when subtracting the current mass, we can postulate on the amount of "blow off" that happened during the interstellar collapse and fusion ignition.