Almost 400 extrasolar planets have been found to date (see Physics Today, May 2009, page 46), but a new planet reported by Coel Hellier (Keele University) and colleagues stands out. Like many exoplanets, theirs, dubbed WASP-18b, is massive (10 times the mass of Jupiter) and has a small orbital radius (only 1/50th of Earth's). But its orbital period of only 0.94 day is the shortest for any "hot Jupiter" yet observed. Moreover, its large mass and small orbit are predicted to cause the strongest tidal interactions of any known star–planet system. According to current theory, the tidal bulge that the planet raises on its host star exerts a torque that will drain angular momentum from the planet and cause it to spiral inward. (For more on tidal interactions, see Physics Today, August 2009, page 11.) If the star's tidal dissipation rate is comparable to what's been measured for binary stars and for the gas giants in our own solar system, the infall will be quick: WASP-18b has less than a million years left in a lifetime, estimated from the age of its host star, of about a billion years. Over the next decade, WASP-18b's death spiral should produce a measurable shift in the planet's observed transit time. The absence of tidal decay—a notable possibility, given the rarity of finding a planet so close to the end of its life—would constitute direct evidence for a different class of tidal interactions in the host star and provide new constraints on models of stellar interiors. (C. Hellier et al., Nature 460, 1098, 2009.)—Richard J. Fitzgerald
A new exoplanet to test tide theories
Categories:
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://blogs.physicstoday.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3918
2 Comments
Search
Categories
- Acoustics (12)
- Astronomy and cosmology (40)
- Atomic physics (23)
- Biography and personalities
- Biological physics (43)
- Careers and employment
- Chemical physics and molecular physics (37)
- Classical mechanics and electromagnetism (5)
- Computational physics (15)
- Condensed matter (47)
- Crystallography (8)
- Earth sciences (37)
- Education (1)
- Energy policy and R&D (6)
- Engineering and technology (34)
- Facilities and laboratories (1)
- Fluids & rheology (29)
- Government agencies (2)
- History, sociology, and philosophy (1)
- Instrumentation (12)
- Materials science (31)
- Medical physics (4)
- Metrology and fundamental constants (4)
- Microscopy (13)
- Nanoscale science and technology (25)
- Nonlinear science and emergent phenomena (17)
- Nuclear and particle physics (17)
- Optics and photonics (36)
- Plasma physics (7)
- Quantum physics and information (23)
- Science policy and politics (4)
- Scientific societies and awards
- Statistical physics and thermodynamics (14)
- Theoretical physics (16)
Monthly Archives
- June 2011 (5)
- May 2011 (8)
- April 2011 (8)
- March 2011 (9)
- February 2011 (7)
- January 2011 (8)
- December 2010 (9)
- November 2010 (8)
- October 2010 (9)
- September 2010 (8)
- August 2010 (9)
- July 2010 (8)
- June 2010 (8)
- May 2010 (8)
- April 2010 (9)
- March 2010 (9)
- February 2010 (7)
- January 2010 (7)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (8)
- October 2009 (10)
- September 2009 (8)
- August 2009 (9)
- July 2009 (9)
- June 2009 (9)
- May 2009 (7)
- April 2009 (9)
- March 2009 (9)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (7)
- December 2008 (8)
- November 2008 (7)
- October 2008 (9)
- September 2008 (9)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (11)
- June 2008 (2)
New calculations shows that WASP-18b probably not will be stable in its present orbit, but will be thrown away with from the star, with a velocity 3 times higher than the velocity astronomers today believe it “should” approach the star.
This certainly will be a big shock, and something we should be able to confirm within 1 to 2 years.
The idea that also planets are affected of the same accelerating force that space probes (by fly by) support this new theory and make it also possible to understand the cause of the 4 following mysteries:
1.)Why gas-planets can be found very closed to starts ( with their atmosphere intact)
2.)Why huge planets can be found more as 15 billion km. from their mother stars.
3.)How Jupiter’s was created (longer away from the Sun) and what brought it closer to the Sun.
4.)How water came to earth.
Introduction
http://www.science27.com/english/the_pioneer_anomaly.html
Updates:
http://www.science27.com/english/Culcu3.htm
UPDATE
The conclusion in my previous post was wrong.
It’s not enough only to consider the possible force that can be pass by, - based on the angel velocity as a result of a astronomic bodies rotation (centrifugal force) affecting the planet (WASP-18b).
It’s also necessary calculating the possible energy requirement and compare that to the (rotation) energy available due to the stars rotation..
This shows that even though if enough energy fast “could” be transmitted to Wasp-18b, it’s simply not available.
Wasp-18b will therefore approach the star, and will not only be affected by the tidal effect (expected 2.8 s. per year) but will probably also be effected by too weak rotation energy (+ 2 s per year) Total 4.8 s. per year.
However Wasp-18b should have been dismissed for several hundred million years ago. How could it “hide it self” from the tidal force so long time?
The answer seems to be “written in the stars”.
By comparing with other solar systems we can easy understand the logic. (The site is now updated and much better now) >
http://www.science27.com/english/SolarSystems.htm
Sorry for the confusion…