In the 10 years since researchers at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia, first reported producing the superheavy element 114 (see Physics Today, April 1999, page 21), some tens of other sightings of the element (as well as elements 115, 116, and 118) have been documented—but all by the same group. Now a team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, led by Heino Nitsche and Ken Gregorich, has confirmed the results. Such independent verification is important, particularly given evidence of fabricated results for other superheavy elements (see Physics Today, September 2002, page 15), but it is complicated by experimental challenges, including picobarn (10−40 m2) reaction cross sections and radioactive targets. Working with the lab's 88-inch cyclotron, the Berkeley team followed a process similar to that used at Dubna: They aimed an accelerated beam of calcium-48 ions at a target containing plutonium-242. The reaction products passed through a gas-filled mass spectrometer, which separated out the nuclei of interest, to a detector that yielded energy and timing information not only for the products but also for any alpha particles or fission fragments they emitted. Amid the data the researchers collected over their eight days of running the experiment, they found two correlated chains of decays that they identified as starting with 286114 and 287114. Although the lifetimes (tenths of seconds), decay modes, and decay energies agree with the Dubna results, the cross sections measured by the Berkeley team are lower. That discrepancy, say the researchers, could be due to statistical fluctuations or to some of the element-114 nuclei overshooting the detector. (L. Stavsetra et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 132502, 2009.)—Richard J. Fitzgerald
Element 114 verified
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://blogs.physicstoday.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4027
Well, on my chart (which is from Berkeley) this was discovered in 1999 and is called Ununquadium. More interesting are some of the retracted 116, 117 Discovered at Berkeley but retracted (I suppose the life time wasn't sufficient to verify). But having liftimes of "tenths of seconds" is really long. So GREAT!
Anyone have some aspirin?
So what's the element's name?
whats the point of having such elements if they decay so fast? i know 118 is the next noble gas, so it should be more stable... but really... is it just for bragging rights?
g, your view that tenths of seconds is a short amount of time is a clear indication to your human life-span chauvinism.
So . . . Bob Lazar was telling the truth.
About the 1/10 second lifetime of #114:
It mightn´t seem to be important, but there might be processes, like the Big Bang where our human-defined one second of time is a huge period of time, remember time is relative! Anyhow, when things happens in 1/100000 of a second, 1/10 second of life isnt bad at all. These sofar unknown elements that only live short times might still affect other elements and that is supposedly one of their meanings of existence.