The binding energy of a nucleus—almost 1% of its mass—provides important information about its configuration of protons and neutrons. Theorists particularly want to know the binding energies of transuranic nuclear species approaching the so‑called island of stability predicted to lie not far beyond the most massive element yet discovered—with atomic number Z = 118. Despite the name, the island’s denizens would not be truly stable, just significantly longer‑lived than their offshore neighbors. But until now the masses, and therefore the binding energies, of transuranics have been determined only indirectly, by measuring the energies of α particles released in long α‑decay chains down to nuclei of well‑measured mass. Such indirect determinations can suffer from significant uncertainties and limitations. Now however, Michael Block and coworkers at the GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research in Darmstadt, Germany, have reported the first direct measurement of transuranic masses. The team measured the masses of three short‑lived isotopes of nobelium (Z = 102) created by the fusion of calcium ions from GSI’s heavy‑ion accelerator with target lead nuclei. The least stable of the three has a half‑life of two seconds. Their masses were measured to within a few parts in 108 in a precision Penning trap, an electromagnetic device that confines charged particles in a small cavity and determines their masses by measuring their cyclotron‑orbit frequencies in the trap’s strong magnetic field. What makes the technique particularly challenging for those transuranics whose creation requires fusion is primarily their painfully slow production rates. (M. Block et al., Nature 463, 785, 2010.) —Bertram Schwarzschild
Weighing transuranics
Categories:
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://blogs.physicstoday.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4560
Search
Categories
- Acoustics (12)
- Astronomy and cosmology (40)
- Atomic physics (23)
- Biography and personalities
- Biological physics (43)
- Careers and employment
- Chemical physics and molecular physics (37)
- Classical mechanics and electromagnetism (5)
- Computational physics (15)
- Condensed matter (47)
- Crystallography (8)
- Earth sciences (37)
- Education (1)
- Energy policy and R&D (6)
- Engineering and technology (34)
- Facilities and laboratories (1)
- Fluids & rheology (29)
- Government agencies (2)
- History, sociology, and philosophy (1)
- Instrumentation (12)
- Materials science (31)
- Medical physics (4)
- Metrology and fundamental constants (4)
- Microscopy (13)
- Nanoscale science and technology (25)
- Nonlinear science and emergent phenomena (17)
- Nuclear and particle physics (17)
- Optics and photonics (36)
- Plasma physics (7)
- Quantum physics and information (23)
- Science policy and politics (4)
- Scientific societies and awards
- Statistical physics and thermodynamics (14)
- Theoretical physics (16)
Monthly Archives
- June 2011 (5)
- May 2011 (8)
- April 2011 (8)
- March 2011 (9)
- February 2011 (7)
- January 2011 (8)
- December 2010 (9)
- November 2010 (8)
- October 2010 (9)
- September 2010 (8)
- August 2010 (9)
- July 2010 (8)
- June 2010 (8)
- May 2010 (8)
- April 2010 (9)
- March 2010 (9)
- February 2010 (7)
- January 2010 (7)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (8)
- October 2009 (10)
- September 2009 (8)
- August 2009 (9)
- July 2009 (9)
- June 2009 (9)
- May 2009 (7)
- April 2009 (9)
- March 2009 (9)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (7)
- December 2008 (8)
- November 2008 (7)
- October 2008 (9)
- September 2008 (9)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (11)
- June 2008 (2)