Willis Lamb’s 1947 measurement of the tiny splitting between the 2s and 2p states of atomic hydrogen gave a crucial impetus to the development of quantum electrodynamics (QED). That “Lamb shift” from the Dirac hydrogen spectrum is a 4-μeV increase in the 2s energy level due primarily to vacuum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field. Now Randolf Pohl (Max Plank Institute for Quantum Optics, Garching, Germany) and coworkers at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) in Switzerland have finally measured the analogue of the Lamb shift in the muonic H atom—a proton orbited by a μ− instead of an e−. Muons live only microseconds, but they are 200 times heavier than electrons, and their atomic orbits are correspondingly tighter. The muonic Lamb shift is about 200 meV, and its precise value is particularly sensitive to the proton’s finite size. The PSI experiment was accomplished with precision laser excitation of μ− p atoms created by an intense μ− beam stopping in a small volume of H2 gas at very low pressure. The team measured the muonic Lamb shift to a part in 105 and compared it with elaborate QED calculations that parameterize the proton’s finite size with an effective charge radius Rp. They find an Rp about 4% smaller than that measured, with less precision, by conventional H spectroscopy and e−p scattering experiments. The discrepancy is 5 standard deviations. Either the proton really is smaller than previously thought, argue Pohl and company, or there’s something wrong with the QED calculations or their input constants. But the proton is a quark composite whose size and shape are quantum-chromodynamic manifestations beyond the purview of QED. Several QCD theorists suggest that at the extraordinary precision achieved by the PSI experiment, it may not be possible to describe proton-size effects adequately with a single length parameter. (R. Pohl et al., Nature 466 , 213, 2010.)—Bertram Schwarzschild
Muonic Lamb shift
Categories:
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://blogs.physicstoday.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5109
1 Comment
Search
Categories
- Acoustics (12)
- Astronomy and cosmology (40)
- Atomic physics (23)
- Biography and personalities
- Biological physics (43)
- Careers and employment
- Chemical physics and molecular physics (37)
- Classical mechanics and electromagnetism (5)
- Computational physics (15)
- Condensed matter (47)
- Crystallography (8)
- Earth sciences (37)
- Education (1)
- Energy policy and R&D (6)
- Engineering and technology (34)
- Facilities and laboratories (1)
- Fluids & rheology (29)
- Government agencies (2)
- History, sociology, and philosophy (1)
- Instrumentation (12)
- Materials science (31)
- Medical physics (4)
- Metrology and fundamental constants (4)
- Microscopy (13)
- Nanoscale science and technology (25)
- Nonlinear science and emergent phenomena (17)
- Nuclear and particle physics (17)
- Optics and photonics (36)
- Plasma physics (7)
- Quantum physics and information (23)
- Science policy and politics (4)
- Scientific societies and awards
- Statistical physics and thermodynamics (14)
- Theoretical physics (16)
Monthly Archives
- June 2011 (5)
- May 2011 (8)
- April 2011 (8)
- March 2011 (9)
- February 2011 (7)
- January 2011 (8)
- December 2010 (9)
- November 2010 (8)
- October 2010 (9)
- September 2010 (8)
- August 2010 (9)
- July 2010 (8)
- June 2010 (8)
- May 2010 (8)
- April 2010 (9)
- March 2010 (9)
- February 2010 (7)
- January 2010 (7)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (8)
- October 2009 (10)
- September 2009 (8)
- August 2009 (9)
- July 2009 (9)
- June 2009 (9)
- May 2009 (7)
- April 2009 (9)
- March 2009 (9)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (7)
- December 2008 (8)
- November 2008 (7)
- October 2008 (9)
- September 2008 (9)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (11)
- June 2008 (2)
Bertram
Nice article! When I saw your name, I was heartened that you were still around. Although I retired 5 years ago, I still go into SLAC every day and work half days. I am involved in two experiments EXO, double beta decay in WIPP, a search for a heavy photon ~200 MeV, (dark matter) at Jefferson Lab.
Regards
Al